Given the size and rapid growth of the US Patent Office—from ~3,000 examiners in 2000 to over 8,000 examiners in 2018—it’s no surprise that different patent examination styles have produced significant outcome variability in prosecution outcomes. Examiner statistics reflecting this variability are popping up everywhere, but how can you actually use this data to improve your practice?
2-Minute Webinar Preview
In this webinar, we’ll give you five, easy-to-implement tips for incorporating data into your workflow.
You will also learn:
1) How using examiner statistics can improve prosecution outcomes
2) Why some of the most common examiner metrics can be misleading
3) Ways you can get up-to-date with current prosecution practices